All Blogs
Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado SCOTUS Summary
Rules against impeachment of verdicts must give way to evidence that a verdict was based on racial animus, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled March 6. In Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the Court ruled that a trial judge must consider evidence […]
Buck v. Davis: Supreme Court condemns racially based testimony as factor in imposing death sentence; explains standard to use in deciding certificates of appealability
The U.S. Supreme Court February 22 strongly condemned use of racially based testimony as a factor in assessing a death sentence. In Buck v. Davis, the Court held that a death penalty counsel was ineffective in calling an expert […]
Supreme Court cautions lower courts against expanding qualified immunity
The U.S. Supreme Court on January 9 chastised lower courts for being too eager to deny qualified immunity to police in Sec. 1983 actions. “Clearly established law” for qualified immunity purposes cannot be defined at a “high level of generality,” […]
Supreme Court Issues Decisions on Double Jeopardy, Bank Fraud, and Insider Trading
The U.S. Supreme Court issued three criminal opinions in November and December on double jeopardy, bank fraud, and insider trading. Double Jeopardy In Bravo-Fernandez v. United States, decided Nov. 29, a unanimous Court held that where a jury […]
Bosse v. Oklahoma: Eighth Amendment Ban on Victims’ Relatives’ Opinions about what Sentence a Capital Defendant Should Receive has not been “Implicitly Overruled”
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Oct. 11 that lower courts are not free to assume that the high Court has “implicitly overruled” its holding in Booth that the Eighth Amendment bars admission of victims’ family members’ characterizations and opinions about […]
Supreme Court issues decisions on Hobbs Act robbery of intrastate drug dealers, bribery of public officials, and RICO
The U.S. Supreme Court, in finishing up its term, issued three decisions in late June of interest to public defenders. Hobbs Act robbery of intrastate marijuana dealers In Taylor v. United States, decided June 20, the Court held that the Hobbs Act […]
Voisine v. United States: Upholds Firearms Ban for Persons Convicted of DV Misdemeanors Involving Only Reckless Conduct
People convicted of misdemeanor crimes involving use of physical force against a domestic relation cannot possess firearms or ammunition, even when the offense they were convicted of involves only reckless conduct, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 27. The case […]
Birchfield v. North Dakota: A SCOTUS Summary
States can criminalize refusal to take a breath test without a warrant after an arrest for drunk driving, because a breath test is categorically a search incident to arrest, the U.S. Supreme Court held June 23 in Birchfield v. North Dakota. […]
Utah v. Strieff: Discovery of valid arrest warrant can attenuate taint of illegal stop
The discovery of a valid arrest warrant during an unconstitutional investigatory stop can attenuate the taint of the stop, the U.S. Supreme Court held June 20. In Utah v. Strieff, the Court ruled that even though an initial stop was illegal, […]
Supreme Court issues Five Significant Decisions for Public Defenders
The U.S. Supreme Court issued five decisions through mid-June of interest to public defenders. Ginsburg, Thomas invite double jeopardy challenge Perhaps the most important case so far in June is Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle, but not for the […]
